I saw it few years ago as a news in a mailing list (squeak-dev). I don't remeber any presentation at a Smalltatalk conference. I don't know what is the status, though I imagine it is discontinued. @Nicolas, I wonder what is the difference with Amber. Noury On 14 sept. 2011, at 13:39, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
First time I hear about http://clamato.net/
Alexandre
On 14 Sep 2011, at 06:44, Lukas Renggli wrote:
Hi Frank,
Likely this has nothing to do with PetitParser.
From my understanding: In Clamato the parser was running at the language level (Smalltalk). JTalk introduced a dead-slow method lookup and as a consequence they optimize the parser by moving it to the implementation level (a JavaScript primitive).
Lukas
On 14 September 2011 09:30, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Göran,
Quick question: during your work on Amber, did you find any particularly slow parts of PetitParser?
Or, rephrased: while a hand-written parser is pretty much guaranteed to run faster than PetitParser (or any general parser generator, I reckon), are there any parts of PetitParser that leap out as being ripe for optimisation?
Thanks,
frank
-- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch
-- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Noury Bouraqadi Ecole des Mines de Douai http://car.mines-douai.fr/noury http://twitter.com/#!/NouryBouraqadi -- -19èmes Journées Francophones sur les Systèmes Multi-Agents (JFSMAâ11) http://www.univ-valenciennes.fr/congres/jfsma2011/ 17-19 Octobre 2011, Valenciennes, France -5th International Conference on Smalltalk Technologies http://www.fast.org.ar November 3th - 5th, 2011 Universidad Nacional de Quilmes (Argentina)