Dave, I'm not a fully trained penguin herder yet, so I have to ask a dumb question: is the idea to connect to the same file that went wrong and get an error condition after the fact, or are you hoping that opening and flushing will cause an error by itself? I suspect the problem is very real, and more "random" than that could hope to uncover. Bill -----Original Message----- From: pharo-project-bounces@lists.gforge.inria.fr [mailto:pharo-project-bounces@lists.gforge.inria.fr] On Behalf Of David T. Lewis Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2009 3:27 PM To: Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr; johnmci@smalltalkconsulting.com Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] Shared directories: The bug is quicker than the eye I don't know if this helps, but for purposes of debugging here is a way to get at the error code from a flush(). No doubt I wrote the primitive by accident, not noticing that there was already a primitiveFileFlush in the FilePlugin. aStream := FileStream readOnlyFileNamed: 'foo.tmp'. result := OSProcess accessor flushExternalStream: aStream fileID. errorString := OSProcess accessor primErrorMessageAt: result. Dave On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:57:06AM -0700, John M McIntosh wrote:
If you invoke the flush primitive then it does this on unix/linux/mac- osx/iPhone http://developer.apple.com/mac/library/documentation/Darwin/Reference/ ManPages/man3/fflush.3.html & http://developer.apple.com/mac/library/documentation/Darwin/Reference/ ManPages/man2/write.2.html#//apple_ref/doc/man/2/write
sqInt sqFileFlush(SQFile *f) { /* Return the length of the given file. */
if (!sqFileValid(f)) return interpreterProxy->success(false); fflush(getFile(f)); return 1; }
On windows it does http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa364439(VS.85).aspx
sqInt sqFileFlush(SQFile *f) { if (!sqFileValid(f)) FAIL(); /* note: ignores the return value in case of read-only access */ FlushFileBuffers(FILE_HANDLE(f)); return 1; }
I'll note the api doesn't actually check for errors, give feedback or whatever. *cough* it could be failing and give you a clue, but you would need to resort to FFI to do the file system calls to get the data to visualize, or build your own VM with that returns the result.
On 2009-10-22, at 5:31 PM, Schwab,Wilhelm K wrote:
Hello all,
I'm not sure what to make of this one. I just spent a couple of hours trying to find the "leak" in an algorithm of mine. It was reading roughly 1200 records, claiming to have processed all of them, and yet writing only about 450 rows into an output text file. One clue should have been that the number of output rows was somewhat random; I did not fully appreciate that until I worked around the problme.
I tried an explicit #flush - no help. I looked for logic errors and found none. The file was being written to a Windows hosted share mounted by CIFS (which I am learning to view with contempt) from Ubuntu 9.04. You can see where this is going: writing the file locally gave the expected result.
Any ideas on how one might further isolate the problem? My trust in Windows is well known<g>; I have never liked shared directories; I _really_ do not like CIFS as compared (reliability wise) to SMBFS; the network between me and the server is in question too (long story). All of that said, file support in Squeak, and hence so far inherited by Pharo, is not the best code I have seen to date, so it is easy to suspect too. Can one argue that since it worked locally, Pharo is not the problem?
The little bit that I know of cifs is not encouraging. It sounds as though things moved from an easily killed process into the kernel which shows an almost Windows-like unwillingness to shut down when it cannot see servers. I have found numerous reports of problems copying large files over cifs, and I have enountered them too.
Bill
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project