Feb. 21, 2011
2:05 p.m.
Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Thanks juan We will look at it :) Having a fast and safe transcripter is good.
Good. At least there one person in our communities is interested on this. I am disappointed, as the number of people who actually commented on the relevance of said TranscriptStream problems, or on how my new implementations succeeds or fails to fix them is zero. Not that I really believed I would "instantly become a hero"... But I can't understand how nobody else had trouble with the Transcript in the past, to the point of taking a look at the code, trying it, and commenting on it. Cheers, Juan Vuletich