Dec. 29, 2009
3:05 p.m.
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Adrian Kuhn <akuhn@iam.unibe.ch> wrote:
On Dec 29, 2009, at 7:21 AM, Julian Fitzell wrote:
Then, having said that, #assume: sounds a bit like the test should assume the statement is true and then carry on running with that assumption. Maybe #expect: would be more descriptive? Or #precondition: ? Not sure...
Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@...> writes:
yes expect: seems better.
Hmm, that sound to me as if the test should fail when the expectations is  not met, whereas in fact it is skipped unless the condition is true.
What about something like #skipUnless: ?
Sure... I think #expect: could be interpreted either way; #skipUnless: pretty unambiguous. Julian