Jan. 12, 2016
4:40 p.m.
In order of preference: 1. UnifiedFFI 2. FFI-Unified (suggests that there may be multiple FFI implementations) 3. UFFI (not clear to me that this is an FFI) Cheers, Max
On 12 Jan 2016, at 16:55, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
People has pointed (and they are right) that the name of the new FFI front-end is misleading. So yesterday I was talking with Stef and we think UnifiedFFI (or UFFI, for short) is a better name⦠and to keep packages prox. to regular FFI I was thinking on rename FFI-NB packages to FFI-Unified⦠but maybe is better just to rename them as UFFI or UnifiedFFI⦠what do you think?
Esteban