Thanks Henrik, it is working great. Magma tests are running right now. Now, what should we do. I have the changeset with this changes. Should I open other ticket, referencing 3247, attach the CS so that is part of PharoCore 1.2.1 or should we wait to see if someone else hits this issue? So, part of PharoCore 1.2.1 or part of ConfigurationOfMagma dependencies? I vote for part of 1.2.1, Stef, what do you think? Again, thanks Henrik, for the solution. Cheers El mar, 15-03-2011 a las 18:00 +0100, Henrik Sperre Johansen escribió:
On 15.03.2011 17:39, Miguel Cobá wrote:
El mar, 15-03-2011 a las 09:07 +0100, Stéphane Ducasse escribió:
On Mar 15, 2011, at 5:58 AM, Miguel Cobá wrote:
I am trying to run Magma and uses TextConstants at: idiom.
Before 3247 TextConstants was a Dictionary and the at: message works ok. But now that it is a SharedPool there is no way to use the external code without modify it before it works in Pharo 1.2. This change doesn't even tries to present the same interface to acces the Text constants as before. The TextConstants>>at: message in Pharo 1.2 is the Object>>at: method that obviously doesn't work. How could we do that? If the system badly uses a global variable in all sort of different ways then there is no way that we can propose the same interface.
Ok, I understand that, but also it was known that it would break code. This is also understandable. and a price to pay to have this system going forward. My point is the change was made, and no care for the users was made in either:
- stating somewhere (maybe the list, a wiki, a faq) the consequences of this change and the advantages over the old code. - a way to migrate old code to the new code.
This, at least for someone that has never used shared pools, isn't obvious. The issue tracker says something about importing the shared pool in the class using it so it can access its values. But there are package extensions that add methods to other classes that use TextConstants, how is one to work out this case, adding TextConstant sharedpool to the class (array in the case of magma that is augmented by a couple of methods that uses TextConstants)
Then TextConstants had different and bad use: - storing constants - storing volatile information about fonts and all sorts of registrations for fonts!!! in textConstants "oh yes this is the dictionary so lets us mess there" instead of using adequate classVariables in adequate classes (we should still clean this part). TextSharedInformation below is for the moment containing all the crap.
I understand.
What is the reason of this change? Why is better than the dictionary (I suppose that reifying it is a reason)?
because TextConstants was the **last** global pool and it was like a jellyfish. In fact when SharedPool were introduced by andreas (it was a good idea BTW) TextConstants was left because it was touching a lot of code.
Exactly, and this change let a lot of code in the cold without warning or a migration path.
If we want to be able to get a bootstrappable core (and eliot and us want that) then we should clean the mess. Yes all the sharedPool are subclasses of sharedPool except TextConstants.... imagine the code to manage that. Is it a class, a traits, a global is it a dictionary of may be this is textConstants.....
What is the intended usage for code that uses TextConstants the dictionary access way? Specifically, code like this doesn't work anymore in Pharo1.2
self ~~ (TextConstants at: #DefaultTabsArray) and: [ self ~~ (TextConstants at: #DefaultMarginTabsArray) ]
Using accessors to control access to defaultTabsArrat and DefaultMargin.... is the first steps. Like that migration is easier. Yes, I now, but this means that all the code using the at: message in TextConstants is broken in the new Pharo1.2. Maybe this hasn't been noted (at least for me it hasn't) because PharoCore 1.2 wasn't stable but now that is stable people will try to load code that uses TextConstants and if uses the at: message it won't work.
Don't get me wrong. I am for the progress of Pharo and this change is in that direction but it appears to me that was without notice and without a deprecation warning akin to the method deprecation. This was released to the world without time for package to catch up and prepare either a patch to the code or a PharoCompatibility package that copes with usage of TextConstants.
Now I do not really understand why a database has to change that kind of text information.
I don't know either because I'm not expert on magma but that is besides the point.
Now what I will do is to add (after consulting with Chris) a Pharo specific package to magma, or if that isn't possible, an add-on in PharoTaskForces that is loaded after magma packages and overwrites the methods using TextConstants with the Pharo specific shared pool implementation. This I suppose will dirty the Magma package and I don't like it so much.
So, dear Magma on Pharo users, the ConfigurationOfMagma isn't usable yet. Please wait a couple of days more. :/
Cheers How about: <category: 'backwards compatability' at: aSymbol ^self classPool at: aSymbol
at: aSymbol put: aValue ^self deprecated: 'TextConstants is not a place to store your stuff' on: '15 March 2011' in: 'Pharo1.2'
Cheers, Henry
-- Miguel Cobá http://twitter.com/MiguelCobaMtz http://miguel.leugim.com.mx