Comment #17 on issue 3706 by renggli: In OB: Text in comment pane of Browser uses syntax highlighting http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3706 The read only access in my repository is intentional: For OmniBrowser it took me over 2 years to fix 200+ broken tests, to fix 5000+ trivial code critics issues, to move code into the right packages, to fix code in the metamodel that directly accessed the view, to fix code that violated basic architectural decisions, to add tests for behavior that nobody cared to write a test for, to remove unused code that was broken and nobody ever tried, etc. And exactly the same story repeated with the refactoring engine; and now again with OmniBrowser. Open repositories where nobody takes responsibility, where nobody reviews all code, where nobody spends a lot of time in exercising and improving the code base every day; and where nobody gives a clear direction of where to go do not work in my opinion (=> I don't want to use such code). I am very happy that PharoCore does not have a public code repository. It seems to work very well. Why would PharoDev take a different approach and have a public code repository?