On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Torsten Bergmann <astares@gmx.de> wrote:
Stef wrote:
does this plan look ok for you?
Yes
Alexandre wrote:
Ok for me. But we need a Beta that is regularly built for this.
+1 especially since it is currently broken (see http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/pharo-project/2010-May/027376.html)
It is not broken. As you see in the name of the image: Pharo-1.1-*11367* -Beta1dev10.05.1 AND in the name of the metacello version: '1.1-beta1.10517'. So...if you take a Core 11367 and load the metacellol version, it will work perfect. That's not broken. How can you assure that for any core version the same metacello version can work on it? That's impossible.
Stef wrote
I found the traits bug :)
OK, can we expect a fix in the next update (11373?).
I don't know. If someone proposes a fix, then yes. Probaly next week I can create a Pharo beta2 if you want.
Using ConfigurationOfPharo anyone is able to rebuild an own beta to test and from time to time mariano can upload a full beta image.
Yes, but it is not a matter of the ConfigurationOfPharo. I can update it, but if noone fixes Nile... Cheers Mariano Bye
T.
-- GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project