On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Stefan Marr <smalltalk@stefan-marr.de>wrote:
And here we go:
On 17 Jan 2012, at 19:37, Stefan Marr wrote:
After fixing that, I get these numbers: #(102851 10781 10798 9511 10335 9883) Not really impressive.
I did not immediately see how to avoid the compression. The image size goes currently up by ca. 50%, from 22MB to 31MB.
#(76700 1787 1793 1768 1741 1748)
That is space for performance: image size is at 39MB.
Not that my version with an extra dictionary is still faster by about 20% (1.4s vs. 1.7s) since it avoids the decoding from the compiled method.
Is there any general use for such an embedding, beside making the finder usable?
I have created a separate thread because under this subject nobody will read it. I will answer there.
Best regards Stefan
-- Stefan Marr Software Languages Lab Vrije Universiteit Brussel Pleinlaan 2 / B-1050 Brussels / Belgium http://soft.vub.ac.be/~smarr Phone: +32 2 629 2974 Fax: +32 2 629 3525
-- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com