On 3 September 2012 04:34, Lawson English <lenglish5@cox.net> wrote:
On 9/2/12 6:32 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
Hi,
i was in a mood of making some overhauls.. so as result i refurbished a type system a bit.. removed all bogus C-like class names , e.g. NBUnsignedIntType ... [...]
P.P.S. i would really like some help with testing what i did, including writing some more tests to cover type system more broadly (now since type names follow certain naming rule, many different types can be checked without much coding)
I'm working up a set of methods (you've seen a few of them) to demo the syntax of how to use the assembler. Perhaps that can be used as part of the testing?
Of course they can. Anything which tries to do something without using common code paths is welcome.
Also, I haven't checked , but are the MMX/SMP instruction sets implemented yet?
I don't remember. x86 has a lot of instructions. (and poor documentation).
If not, do you have a timeframe for when you might get around to it? My own intuition is that these are where people will get the most benefit from using the assembler anyway.
My current interests lying elsewhere.. but hey, if someone needs them feel free to add support in assembler.. Dont wait for me :) -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.