Re: [Pharo-project] [squeak-dev] AST-Core for Pharo and Squeak?

Dec. 6, 2009

      Did you run the tests, especially RBParserTest? They do all pass on Pharo.

Does Squeak implement #isVariable on Object?

Lukas

2009/12/6 HernÃ¡n Morales Durand <hernan.morales@gmail.com>:
...
Hi guys,
 I've noticed a different behavior relating the RBParseTreeSearcher
between Pharo and Squeak, using AST-Core-lr.33, the following code:
| rbMethodNode |
rbMethodNode := RBParser parseMethod: 'test [  ]'.
( RBParseTreeSearcher new
       matches: '`{:node | node isVariable }'
       do:[: aNode : answer | answer add: aNode; yourself ] )
               executeTree: rbMethodNode initialAnswer: Set new.
gives an empty Set in Pharo-Core (#11072) and  a Set(RBSequenceNode())
in Squeak 3.10.2
Does anybody know if I should use a different AST-Core version for
Squeak? An alternative repository maybe?
HernÃ¡n
-- 
Lukas Renggli
http://www.lukas-renggli.ch

2009/12/6 HernÃ¡n Morales Durand <hernan.morales@gmail.com>:
...
Hi guys,
Â I've noticed a different behavior relating the RBParseTreeSearcher
between Pharo and Squeak, using AST-Core-lr.33, the following code:
| rbMethodNode |
rbMethodNode := RBParser parseMethod: 'test [ Â ]'.
( RBParseTreeSearcher new
Â  Â  Â  Â matches: '`{:node | node isVariable }'
Â  Â  Â  Â do:[: aNode : answer | answer add: aNode; yourself ] )
Â  Â  Â  Â  Â  Â  Â  Â executeTree: rbMethodNode initialAnswer: Set new.
gives an empty Set in Pharo-Core (#11072) and Â a Set(RBSequenceNode())
in Squeak 3.10.2
Does anybody know if I should use a different AST-Core version for
Squeak? An alternative repository maybe?
HernÃ¡n
-- 
Lukas Renggli
http://www.lukas-renggli.ch