On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
So again I am not complaining about the fact that you haven't looked at this or that bit of code. Your response of "we havent had time to look at that " winds me up, because I hear it as "we havent had time to audit your potentially inferior code that might be below us to use." and that very attitude misses the point completely.
All of Stef objections, demonstrate that this is how he sees it.
I am complaining that you see the issue as a bunch of "potentially inferior" code contributions to your cause, rather than "we have something to contribute to the community of SUnit and MC users, because MC and SUnit are frameworks that everyone uses and depends on."
We believe your work (MC, SUnit, Sake and Packages) is important enough for an integration into Pharo. We don't want to consider it as an external package. But for that, Pharo's maintainers must have a look at the code and decide if it is safe to include. Your code is not of lower quality. Have a nice day and please continue working on these tools -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st