Let us know if we need to reintroduce it. But what would be nice is to understand exactly what was used and for what. Because the startup was full of strange dependencies (Some of them were bogus) Stef On Sep 5, 2011, at 6:55 PM, Gary Chambers wrote:
More specifically, we had Abstractlauncher subclasses...
Regards, Gary
----- Original Message ----- From: "Igor Stasenko" <siguctua@gmail.com> To: <Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr> Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 5:37 PM Subject: Re: [Pharo-project] AutoStart, where are you?
Yes, but why Autostart? why after, not before? Does it makes sense to declare an order (and as a consequence introducing a dependency), when there is no preference?
On 5 September 2011 18:28, Gary Chambers <gazzaguru2@btinternet.com> wrote:
I miss that too! (all our deployed apps used it)
Regards, Gary
----- Original Message ----- From: "Sean P. DeNigris" <sean@clipperadams.com> To: <pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr> Sent: Monday, September 05, 2011 5:09 PM Subject: [Pharo-project] AutoStart, where are you?
This class was in 1.2, but is missing in 1.3. Why was it removed and what has replaced it? Also, is there a flaw in the deprecation system that has me ask these questions in the first place?
I can't load XMLRPC because of:
Smalltalk addToStartUpList: self after: AutoStart.
What do I replace this with?
Sean
p.s. I found mentions in several issues and ml posts, but nothing definitive.
-- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/AutoStart-where-are-you-tp3791613p3791613.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.