Hi Eliot: On 13 Feb 2014, at 05:46, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda@gmail.com> wrote:
Hmm. Whatâs the easiest way to map this to a Monticello mcz so I can integrate your changes back into my packages?
I think the bigger question is whether you actually want to adopt those things. If you skim over the diffs on Github [1], you will probably find that most of the changes are necessary to adopt Pharo-specific API changes. Not sure what the best way forward would be to avoid having the two Squeak and Pharo flavors diverge even more. I am open to suggestions, donât have a good idea how to properly âmodularizeâ these differences myself⦠Best regards Stefan [1] https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-vm/pull/18 -- Stefan Marr INRIA Lille - Nord Europe http://stefan-marr.de/research/