On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Ferlicot D. Cyril <cyril.ferlicot@gmail.com> wrote:
Le 30/07/2015 09:04, Marcus Denker a écrit :
Hi,
We have 622 open issues. There are *a lot* of old issues that nobody will ever look at. Please check those that *you* submitted to see what the status is!
If it is just âwould be niceâ, but not even on a level that you yourself are willing to even send a mail to the mailing list to get people interested in helping you to push the case forward, maybe you could think about closing the issue?
Maybe someone asked a question? If you submit an issue and there is a question not answered for a month, we should close it: How important can it be? Why should *I* spend the time to fix this issue if *you* are not even willing to answer a question in a minute?
It makes no sense to have lots and lots of issues that are not important even for the submitter.
Another thing is that issues get fixed, subsystems replaced, code removed⦠and the amazing thing is that *never* the submitter of the original report closes it, even in these obvious cases.
The issue tracker is not a one way street!
Marcus
I think we can close this issue: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/4399/deprecate-on-send-to-and-use-when-sen...
We deprecated Announcer>>on:send:to: and Announcer>>on:do: previously.
Do all senders need to be converted first? cheers -ben