On Feb 21, 2011, at 7:04 PM, Eliot Miranda wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 6:05 AM, Juan Vuletich <juan@jvuletich.org> wrote: Stéphane Ducasse wrote: Thanks juan We will look at it :) Having a fast and safe transcripter is good.
Good. At least there one person in our communities is interested on this.
I am disappointed, as the number of people who actually commented on the relevance of said TranscriptStream problems, or on how my new implementations succeeds or fails to fix them is zero.
Not that I really believed I would "instantly become a hero"... But I can't understand how nobody else had trouble with the Transcript in the past, to the point of taking a look at the code, trying it, and commenting on it.
Igor and I agree. We want TranscriptStream to remain a subclass of WriteStream, by all means thread-safe (I think the one in the Teleplace images is thread-safe), and including a log file is fine. But the view must be separate.
sorry but TranscriptStream was not thread safe else I would not have written threadSafeTranscript. Stef