Hi. I am sure I saw model inside presenter in Spec. It was one of reason why presenter is better name. We had Model model. Now it is Presenter model. But if your wrote this there is no reference from presenter to model now? 15 Ð¼Ð°Ñ 2016 г. 10:29 полÑзоваÑÐµÐ»Ñ "stepharo" <stepharo@free.fr> напиÑал:
In MVP the presenter has direct access to the Model and (of course it means that the Model API is fixed)
I did not mean that Model :) I meant the relationship with View. Stef Why would that be true? You can plug the necessary behavior of how the model can be accessed, so no need to fix the Model's API. After all the actual model will vary from user the user, so the API can't be fixed. On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 8:39 PM, stepharo <stepharo@free.fr> wrote:
Hi
In MVP the presenter has direct access to the Model and (of course it means that the Model API is fixed) but I wonder if this would not
help us simplify Spec.
Model <---- presenter <----> View
What do you think?
Stef