Jan. 6, 2009
9:38 a.m.
On Jan 6, 2009, at 8:04 AM, Lukas Renggli wrote:
So why do we do pharo. Really. If everything as to be compatible with other smalltalk. Terrible. Can't we get smarter?
You are right, this change does not harm anyone not using the method.
We'll have to update our tests of methods not to be sent.
Still, I would rather like to see methods removed from Collection than added.
Yes can you make a list of the ones that are conflicting with other implementations?
Why can't we tag the methods with <notAnsi> and build a tool that check when you do a fill out.
The problem is that such message sends can't be reliably detected statically.
I lost me here. Stef