On 23 May 2012 19:48, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
On May 23, 2012, at 7:41 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
On 23 May 2012 18:57, Sebastian Sastre <sebastian@flowingconcept.com> wrote:
Hey guys,
this is kind of a show stopper for images in production :/ http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=5965
i thought we already dealt with it. no?
No, the image as it is now just quits. Delayed our deployment of the ESUG registration server for some weeks... normal seaside use, image quites after a day.
It's far from obvious.
I think the image should work out of the box. Why destinguish between deployment and development? What is good in deployment is for sure gut in development.
perhaps we should write a watchdog of external semaphore table. to see if semaphore orphaned and detect by whom.
    Marcus
-- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de
-- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.