On 19 Jan 2014, at 12:19, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
I guess that once we will use git it will go away. Does anybody know if this is a correct assmption?
yes, is correct :) alll that information can live outside the image without actually lose of information (it will be there, when we need it).
On 19 Jan 2014, at 10:10, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
Very very nice! I integrate issue 12679.
Yes, Monticello meta data⦠we should check this issue:
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/2711/Monticello-wastes-significant-amounts...
(but in general it is not good to have meta data of a versioning system in the image⦠it needs to be on disk, and the history on disk needs to not by in thousands of zip filesâ¦).
On 18 Jan 2014, at 20:38, Pavel Krivanek <pavel.krivanek@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I finally successfully created a script that is able to unload everything *by Monticello* except kernel packages, network, Monticello, Gofer and related packages. I will setup a job when Jenkins will be healthy again. It uses several temporary patches that we need to solve properly: - make NativeBoost optional - make UserManager optional - small super-easy issue https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12679/change-package-of-ClassTrait-soleIns...
The size of resultant image is about 6.6 MB, 4.9 MB without MC data and caches. BTW in the full image Monticello data have about 5MB. The image has no Undeclared nor obsolete classes and is really able to load something using Gofer.
With some care we can make it usable base for the next remodularization effort.
Cheers, -- Pavel