Maximiliano Taborda wrote
Hi all.
The same examples using Chaltén: February twentyninth, 2012 next: 1 yearMeasure. "=> February 28th, 2013"
This I don't get. Why would <February 28th> + 1 day + 1 year ever not be March 1st? ~75% of the time it would be, but ~25% it would be a day less?
March first, 2011 next: 1 yearMeasure. "=> March 1st, 2012" March first, 2011 next: 12 monthsMeasure. "=> March 1st, 2012"
Hilaire, In Chaltén a year is a year so you don't need to care about of the number of days in it.
Regards. Maxi
2014-12-02 16:37 GMT-03:00 Chris Cunningham <
cunningham.cb@
>:
GenericYear does this. The generic Year will take '2/29/2000' asDate + 1 year "=> 28 February 2001" In other words, we want it at the same time next year; more importantly the same month and close to what we have now. Also: '3/1/2001' asDate - 1 year "=> 1 March 2000" Still, same month - we want to be at the beginning of the month the previous year.
Basically, my idea (and, more importantly, what I expect - hence my code) is that I want to pretend that we do have a field-based representation and make it work that way. except better (since there is no 2/29/2001).
Ej, which one of the followings is OK? '2011-03-01' asDate + 1 year "=> 2012-02-29"
Well, I have a bug here. That needs to be fixed.
-cbc
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Sean P. DeNigris <
sean@
>
wrote:
Esteban A. Maringolo wrote
Ej, which one of the followings is OK? '2012-02-29' asDate + 1 year "=> 2013-02-28" '2011-03-01' asDate + 1 year "=> 2012-02-29"
One solution (just ignore the source ha ha) -
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.datetime.addyears%28v=vs.110%...
----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Duration-year-tp4791727p4793656.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Duration-year-tp4791727p4813662.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.