On 29 Sep 2014, at 07:53, Damien Cassou <damien.cassou@gmail.com> wrote:
Nobody knows? This thread is frightening...
The bugs.pharo.org related issue related to the fact that it never ever updated the issues shown is open since 1 week after it was set up, or something like that. Marcus
Le 20 sept. 2014 12:29, "Ben Coman" <btc@openinworld.com> a écrit :
I have two tickets open on Penelope... https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?11550 https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?11551
I'd be happy to give them a go myself if I had access to the code and be able to test it. cheers -ben
Marcus Denker wrote:
On 17 Sep 2014, at 13:02, Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess@web.de> wrote:
Yes but,
2014-09-17 11:25 GMT+02:00 Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr>: Hello,
There are right now 675 open issues. (we managed to close 63 just the last 7 daysâ¦).
A lot of those issues are very old. A lot are in a bad shape:
-> not reproducible -> *completely* unclear what action could lead to solve the issue -> outdated (e.g. small improvements submitted ages ago, but even the author does not care to submit a new version for Pharo4)
I think we should be more radical in closing issues. If someone submits something but can not even answer a simple question in 2 months â> this is the same as âI donât careâ.
2 months are to short. 4 or maybe 6. Yes, you are right 6 months is good.
The idea is that the issue will be closed, but with a mail to the âownerâ of the issue so that he/she can decide to re-open⦠and âwill work on that laterâ would be a valid answer.
There are open issues without any action on our part - for months. And that does not mean "we don't care". If someone reports an issues and don't have the time to react on comments/questions for a couple of months, I understand that.
nicolai
So *PLEASE*:
-> check all the issue that *you* submitted. Are they still relevant? Is there enough information for anyone to do anything? -> check all the issues you where involved with in discussions. It is much easier for you than for me to understand what the conclusion of the discussion is. -> help checking *old* entries. Is is still relevant? What is the next action?
+1
Marcus