Bufff, I hate that "format". Kill me :) I don´t see the message #&& . I have image Pharo dev 10418 BETA. && works as #and: ? is a lazy comparison? Regards 2009/9/14 Stéphane Ducasse-2 (via Nabble) < ml-user+179910-225159042@n2.nabble.com<ml-user%2B179910-225159042@n2.nabble.com>
since I cannot give you feedback on the morphic internal I will give you some smalltalk ones
anchorToLeft: toLeft toRight: toRight toTop: toTop toBottom: toBottom
morph owner notNil ifTrue: [| fractionsRectangle offsetsRectangle owner | owner := morph owner. anchoredToLeft := toLeft. anchoredToRight := toRight. anchoredToTop := toTop. anchoredToBottom := toBottom. ((anchoredToLeft not) and: [anchoredToRight not] and:[anchoredToBottom not] and:[anchoredToTop not ]) ifTrue: [owner addMorph: morph fullFrame: nil.] ifFalse: [ fractionsRectangle := self pvtBuildFractionsRectangle. offsetsRectangle := self pvtBuildOffsetsRectangle:
fractionsRectangle. owner addMorph: morph fullFrame: (LayoutFrame fractions: fractionsRectangle offsets: offsetsRectangle)]].
looks more smalltalkish to me BTW for the ((anchoredToLeft not) and: [anchoredToRight not] and:[anchoredToBottom not] and:[anchoredToTop not ]) it may be more efficient to use &&
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list [hidden email]<http://n2.nabble.com/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3642989&i=0> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
------------------------------ View message @ http://n2.nabble.com/Polymorph-TabIndex-and-layoutFrames-questions-tp3638041... To unsubscribe from Re: Polymorph - TabIndex and layoutFrames questions, click here< (link removed) >.
-- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Polymorph-TabIndex-and-layoutFrames-questions-tp3638041... Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.