It seems very logical to require configs to be save into there own repos. The other locations should just be copies.
On 10 May 2015, at 18:45, Sean P. DeNigris <sean@clipperadams.com> wrote:
For example, Soup's config was updated to declare a stable version for 4.0. It was committed to MetaRepoForPharo40, but not to PharoExtras/Soup. It was confusing that loading from the config browser worked, but loading via another config as a dependent project did not (since we use the canonical repo in that use case).
Specifically, I am asking that if we update a config, and it's not Pharo xyz-specific (i.e. may break other platforms), that we commit back to the canonical repo or notify the maintainer if we don't have repo access. This policy would obviously be especially easy for any project owned by the Pharo team.
Thanks :)
----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Request-Feed-MetaRepoForXyz-Configs-Back-to-Projects-t... Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.