On 22 May 2013 13:20, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2013-05-22, at 14:02, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar@gmail.com> wrote:
On 22 May 2013 12:49, stephane ducasse <stephane.ducasse@free.fr> wrote:
./pharo Pharo.image config filetree://`pwd`/../src/
Fails on trying to execute #mcRepositoryAsUser:withPassword: on a GenericUrl instance inside Gofer.
Yep, I'd agree with your assessment. Has Pharo forked Gofer, or does it still use Lukas Renggli's repository?
We forked it. We cannot built a part of our infrastructure on a project that can vanished in nature.
Well. What I should have asked was "have you cloned the repository with the intention of pushing improvements upstream, or have you forked the project with no intention of pushing changes upstream?"
well, check on how much we changed in detail and them come back.
Sorry, was that supposed to be an answer? I must go find out how much work you've done before guessing whether you've forked and abandoned upstream? Like I said: What I want to know is this: if I want to make a change to infrastructure common to multiple Smalltalks, does Pharo expect me to submit special unique snowflake additions to Pharo AND to upstream? frank