ConfigurationOfMetacello ... load: 'Metacello-ToolBox'. should doit, and the baseline says: package: 'Metacello-ToolBox' with: [ spec requires: #('Metacello-Base' 'Metacello-Core') ]; and the "already included" metacello should be what is in the 'batch' group (Base and some Github access stuff). And I insist, including MetacelloToolBox in the 2.0 core image is a bad idea... Esteban On Nov 4, 2012, at 11:31 AM, Camillo Bruni <camillobruni@gmail.com> wrote:
Anyway what would be the default way to install it?
AFAIK I didn't find any reference in the ConfigurationOfMetacello but then again I am not particularly at searching :P
On 2012-11-04, at 11:27, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
On Nov 3, 2012, at 8:34 PM, Dale Henrichs <dhenrich@vmware.com> wrote:
Out of curiosity, what are some of the undeclared references?
There shouldn't be any undeclared references, unless you ignored the required packages or ??? offhand I can't imagine what they might be...
I checked the latest 2.0 image and there are no Undeclareds there...
With the build server dead (again...) checking of something is destroyed there we need to wait...
-- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de