Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
I think we should not reinvent the wheel in Pharo. I mean, Morphic is nice, although I would like to have native windows so that I can use my Mac expose features. But no, I have only one window. Then, I have something similar but implemented in Pharo using Mac + narrows.
Then, you can have more than one workspace in the OS, why we need to implement the same in Pharo ?
I also have tons of image, and each image (or more than one) for a project. Why don't you use your own OS virtual workspaces and spread you different images over the different workspaces? that's easier than Squeak Projects. And maybe faster and better supported.
Agree .... mind you I don't use spaces :) Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
The ONLY problem is what people said about updating issues in all images. But, :
- In Pharo we have a good package management system now (Metacello). If you use it correctly, you can define all your project dependencies (even working in a core or dev image). So you should be able to load your project in any image without any problem.
Yep, I already mentioned that in my first reply here -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Can-I-use-Projects-in-Pharo-tp2239170p2241332.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.