On Dec 21, 2009, at 3:12 PM, Damien Cassou wrote:
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 8:32 PM, <csrabak@bol.com.br> wrote:
Is there a reason we keep both O2 and OB in parallel? Can't we just get the best parts of one of the solutions and consider the other as the "trunk" or mainstream for Pharo?
Pharo must have the notion of Packages.
I'm working on it have a look at RPackage in PharoTaskForces I took into account the feedback I got from lukas and now the tests are green again so I should be able to continue and start to work on the integration inside the system but if someone wants to help or read the code....
This is a prerequisite of a good package browser. Unless we have that, O2 will be slow and won't be the default.
-- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st
"Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them popular by not having them." James Iry
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project