Re: [Pharo-project] [squeak-dev] Compiler pedantic about ifNotNil: argument

? In any way, passing anything else than block literal as argument should work.

You mean in the implementation or in the semantics? Read my mail. This is a question of semantics. The argument of iftrue:ifFalse: are thunk (piece of code with frozen execution).

This is smalltalk, not C with static types.

consistency and elegance as nothing to do with absence of static types. With such a change we can break a lot of uniformity and break potential type inferencers. And I do not see the advantage, beside having a clunky system. Stef