Indeed. john you are probably right and it can be a good way to make sure that one bold guy will build a unix VM and this way we can avoid a deadlock On Mar 4, 2009, at 8:01 PM, John M McIntosh wrote:
If the unix vm hasn't been updated with basic fixes or even critical fixes for the last two years, why would you put it on the critical decision path?
The macintosh VM is available now, and I'd guess a windows VM should be available since no-doubt qwaq has been building a windows one for bleeding edge deployment since all this work (and more) is being funded by qwaq.
On 4-Mar-09, at 9:19 AM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
sounds a good attitude. We should fix the rest of the items then.
Stef
On Mar 4, 2009, at 6:00 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
Do the major VMs (Unix, Mac, Win) support this *now*? What is the required work to include the closure changes (are they published somewhere?)?
I'd like to avoid that we get a dependency on VMs that would delay version 1.0. If everything is ready, though, I would also vote for including them now.
Cheers, Adrian
-- = = = = = ====================================================================== John M. McIntosh <johnmci@smalltalkconsulting.com> Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd. http:// www.smalltalkconsulting.com = = = = = ======================================================================
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project