Hi, I looked at the problem with Esteban. Essentially, we would benefit a lot from the Context mirror methods that Eliot sent. We can still imagine a mirror object on top of that, but already they would provide a good enough support. Do we agree to add these methods to Pharo? Cheers, Doru
On Nov 19, 2015, at 3:31 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
Hi,
Please tell me more specifically what needs to be done. Could you give me a concrete example of an object that cannot be inspected?
Cheers, Tudor
On Nov 18, 2015, at 6:08 PM, Esteban A. Maringolo <emaringolo@gmail.com> wrote:
2015-11-18 13:29 GMT-03:00 Clément Bera <bera.clement@gmail.com>:
2015-11-18 8:43 GMT-03:00 Guillermo Polito <guillermopolito@gmail.com>:
Iâd like to discuss also the possibility to add those low level operations on mirrors objects, that could be packaged separately from the kernel of the language. Adding them on a first step is easy, then making all tools use them is the hard/timeconsuming part, yes.
All the needed operations already exist. You can put them on your mirror objects without any problem.
Who takes the decision to put it either in EyeInspector or GtInspector?
Regards!
-- www.tudorgirba.com
"Be rather willing to give than demanding to get."
-- www.tudorgirba.com "Yesterday is a fact. Tomorrow is a possibility. Today is a challenge."