On Jan 3, 2011, at 7:28 PM, csrabak@bol.com.br wrote:
Em 03/01/2011 15:01, Stéphane Ducasse < stephane.ducasse@inria.fr > escreveu:
Hi guys I'm brainstorming on what should be our next important actions. My gut feeling is that I would love - to get more class comments and documentation.
I'm all for it. We need to increase the actual and perceived quality of our work.
- get a list of working packages for development expanding the list of packages available from: http://book.pharo-project.org/book/PharoTools
- get metacello repositories up and running and start to get certified packages.
I'm not keeping up with the overwhelming stream of messages in this list and probably may be missing the kernel of it, but just in case: do we have already a certification process for packages?
no and now that hudson is working I would like to see what we can do especially with metacello - loading ok - % comment of - % of red tests
How can we all make sure that this happens?
All of it, it depends on the time frame ;-) IMHO I think priority zero is class comments and documentation and second the certification process.
Attempting to answer the "how" part of the question, I surmise we will keep the discussion on the comments and documentation in the next IRC meeting?
Yes
I see this as THE most important 'cultural' change we all need to undergo because of all collaborations we can envisage, writing documentation (or comments) for someone else code is the less efficient way of doing it.
Perhaps some form of 'pair commenting' via Skype/IM or IRC _before_ the code is uploaded?
I do not know. Now I try to systematically write comments. I would like to take some example like the soup package and see how it goes. Stef
My 0.019999
-- Cesar Rabak