Andres Valloud-4 wrote:
Well, since this discussion is public now :)
hee hee Andres Valloud-4 wrote:
... exactly what seems to be the problem? The book talks about code that is often in the public Store repository. Is the problem that the code in the public Store repository doesn't have an MIT license? Or is the problem that the book that talks about the code in the public Store repository doesn't say "and the code has an MIT license"?
Would a license expert weigh in here? Andres, would it be difficult to add a note to the book specifying that the code in it is MIT? -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/A-Mentoring-Course-on-Smalltalk-Code-License-tp2714255... Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.