May 19, 2015
5:49 a.m.
On 13 May 2015, at 11:21, Denis Kudriashov <dionisiydk@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks's Marcus. It is beautiful thing.
Is parsing locate errors by "dot"s? I mean how it will parse "3+. 1+2"? It will be super cool if we have only "3+." as error but remains code as good one
You can just look at OpalCompiler new source: 'method 3+. 1+2'; useFaultyForParsing: true; parse. with the GT inspector, it has a very nice AST view:
