Jan. 7, 2011
2:23 p.m.
2011/1/7 <pharo@googlecode.com>:
Comment #16 on issue 3436 by step...@stack.nl: #copyFrom: is broken http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3436
5.7.8.7 does not adequately explain why copy should be part of the method name. To me it looks like accidental complexity, and I would like to avoid spreading it.
Because you have two ways to copy a string : - a copy of the full string - a partial copy from start index to stop index does this POV makes it clearer ? Nicolas