Re: [Pharo-dev] Can't correctly inspect ring definitions

...

To me it looks wrong for RGClassDefinition implementing #instVarNamed:.

probably (this is the question of layering) now it also means that we should have a look at the class protocol to access instance variables so that we have an Object API but also a good Class/RingClass API.

Stef

I didn't understand what you said. I think this is false polymorphism here: Object >> instVarNamed: ---> answers the value of the inst var (or raises an error if it doesn't exist) RGClassDescriptionDefinition >> instVarNamed: ---> answers a RGInstanceVariableDefinition (or nil if it doesn't exist) Martín