Hi, A question: do we need to revert all VMs if only the Linux 32 is not working? Do we prefer to release all together because it is easier to manage? Cheers, Doru
On Apr 13, 2018, at 12:28 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
On 13 Apr 2018, at 12:12, Alistair Grant <akgrant0710@gmail.com> wrote:
On 13 April 2018 at 12:02, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
On 13 Apr 2018, at 11:57, Alistair Grant <akgrant0710@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Esteban,
I don't know whether you also updated the 6.1 VMs, but for the Pharo 7 VMs could you consider only reverting the linux 32 bit VM?
I reverted all. And I started to check the linux problem.
OK. Just for reference, linux 64 bits on Ubuntu 16.04 is fine so far. :-)
yes I knew it :P
Esteban
Cheers, Alistair
cheers! Esteban
ps: I think I will separate dependency build from vm build, as I talked with Nico and Eliot before⦠this is too much and no reason to keep having problems just because a dependency breaks (dependencies should not be built all the time anyway).
Pharo 7 is alpha, so anyone (well, most people :-)) using it are prepared for a few hiccups, and it will provide better confidence when you do the next update.
Thanks, Alistair
On 13 April 2018 at 11:53, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
On 13 Apr 2018, at 11:50, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
meh⦠and I will be to revert again.
I will *need* to revert, I meant.
Esteban
linux 32 VM libgit2 is not working, it seems.
I will revert. And I will do an stop the world to fix the VM dependency problems because this is too much.
Next week, updates of iceberg will come from Guilleâs hand, I will be working on VM-side.
cheers, Esteban
On 13 Apr 2018, at 10:42, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
On 13 Apr 2018, at 10:31, Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckwich@gmail.com> wrote:
Thank you Esteban. Including 7.0 64 bits ?
All VMs. (Still not 64bit windows, sorry)
Esteban
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I just promoted new VMs as stable.
This are the builds corresponding to:
201804122226 (07c6dc3)
this passed the build tests so *it should* be ok.
can you people test?
thanks!
Esteban
-- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (SU/IRD/UY1) "Programs must be written for people to read, and only incidentally for machines to execute." http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/
-- www.tudorgirba.com www.feenk.com "To utilize feedback, you first have to acquire it."