Oct. 20, 2010
10:15 a.m.
Hi, Currently, to mark a test as an expected failure, `expectedFailures` should be overwritten (http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3976596/how-to-mark-expected-failures-in-...). That's a bit tricky to figure out, so I added a comment to the method: SUnit-NikoSchwarz.114. However, I think it's still a usability bug: marking something as an expectedFailure isn't visible inside the test. I think expectedFailures should look through the pragmas of its tests and return an array of all method names that contain the pragma <expectedFailure>. Cheers, Niko -- http://scg.unibe.ch/staff/Schwarz twitter.com/nes1983 Tel: +41 076 235 8683