On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Torsten Bergmann <astares@gmx.de> wrote:
Thanks Torsten. I wasn't aware of such package. So..for next release I will add a project reference from ConfigurationOfPharo to ConfigurationOfHelpSystem
No, please just add the package I've mentioned since the ConfigurationOfHelpSystem was before the integration into Squeak/Pharo and would load old code.
Meanwhile we had adaptions (we dont have the Squeak support code in Pharo for instance and vice versa).
Maybe we should remove ConfigurationOfHelpSystem since it now adds more confusion.
Ok. Got it. I will then just load that package.
It is not clear for me where Help packages should be hosted. For example, ScriptManager host its own Help package in its own repository. But Metacello is in the HelpSystem repository.
The book for Metacello was just a demo - typically I would expect them to be in the same repo as the code. I dont want a "docu only" repo - if it is close to the code it will be easier to know and maintain it.
100% agree. Dale, do you think it is worth to take the Help package from HelpSystem repository and put it in Metacello repo ? Thanks Mariano
Thx T.
-- GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project