Le 5/10/15 22:27, Yuriy Tymchuk a écrit :
On 05 Oct 2015, at 22:23, stepharo <stepharo@free.fr> wrote:
marcus this is about completion not syntax hilighting and the logic can be tricky. The student that was planning to work on it used a statistcal model that shows that it was much better than the default eclipse one. Now he just left. He was from Delft :).
The idea to rely on sat can help you to understand whether you are typing a parameter (variable, literal) or a message, and whether it is the beginning of a new message or a continuation of a keyword one.
ah ok then.
Uko
P.S. Iâm not AST expert, but this is how I understand some things
Stef
Le 5/10/15 09:25, Marcus Denker a écrit :
On 05 Oct 2015, at 08:39, Stephan Eggermont <stephan@stack.nl> wrote:
On 04/10/15 23:53, Peter Uhnák wrote:
This is both rant and list of questions/notes/observations...
...but first of all: do Smalltalkers not like code completion? Because the one in Pharo is really poor and not only that nobody is doing anything about it, *but also nobody is complaining*; this leads me to believe that you either
a) don't have the manpower (this is true pretty much always, so no complaints here) Definitely. The issue tracker has lots of interesting completion related issues, like https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13124/NECContext-needs-plugin-design
Yes, and we need to change it to use the AST instead of Shout⦠that could simplify it a lot.
Marcus