Yes http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2282 On Apr 7, 2010, at 3:17 PM, Adrian Lienhard wrote:
Usually I put the 1.1 tag on items I integrated in 1.0 and I didn't close the issues so they are not lost. The only one I remember that we may also want to integrate is the network rollback. Not sure what the plan is there. But it doesn't seem anybody is working on a better implementation so I suggest we also roll back in 1.1.
Adrian
On Apr 7, 2010, at 14:20 , Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr>wrote:
Hi Adrian
Once 1.0 is released we should check that all the fixes that went in 1.0 after the fork to 1.1 are integrated in 1.1.
The problem is how we can identify them ? I only remember http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=1841 but it even is different in 1.1
Ahh maybe also the NetNameResolver problem ?
Would be nice also to remove the testsexpected to break so that we give them a chance to be fixed in 1.1.
Good idea.
Stef _______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________ Pharo-project mailing list Pharo-project@lists.gforge.inria.fr http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project