On 26 Nov 2013, at 15:21, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar@gmail.com> wrote:
Oh, I see. Use STOMP to shove messages into RabbitMQ, and then you can do whatever you like. I thought Phil was talking about using AMQP directly. Writing a conformant/correct AMQP client is pretty hard, and a lot of work, hence why I asked.
AMQP would be faster as well I guess, but indeed much harder to implement.
frank
On 26 November 2013 14:16, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
On 26 Nov 2013, at 14:00, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar@gmail.com> wrote:
On 26 November 2013 12:21, phil@highoctane.be <phil@highoctane.be> wrote:
On the front of interoperability, I personally have chosen to go the RabbitMQ route, it allows me to wire all kinds of things together with some room for scale.
What are you using on the Smalltalk side? I know Tony Garnock-Jones did some basic parsing of AMQP, but I'm unaware of anything more than that. Do you FFI to the C client library? Something else?
frank
I think Phil plans on using Stamp
https://github.com/svenvc/docs/blob/master/neo/stamp.md
it is a pretty simple and easy to understand interface.
Sven