On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
On 26 Aug 2014, at 10:18, Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckwich@gmail.com> wrote:
GPL is not compatible with Pharo. All code that is part of the Pharo main distribution is either historical (Apple Licence) or MIT.
We even let people sign a document that makes this clear.
New code has to be MIT, we do not accept any other license (as part of the main distribution).
e.g. Zinc was done because the HTTP server we were using was made GPL (it did not have a licence when we started to use it).
I completely agree with you. This why I was worried with this double licencing of spec.
I do not think that you can change a license without getting the OK of all authors, I guess it is a mistake in the config of the project.
This is not a mistake, look here: https://github.com/spec-framework/spec/commit/07ea83ca50523b4a912e363ff2f397... -- Serge Stinckwich UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC) Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/