Aug. 12, 2011
9:32 p.m.
On 12 August 2011 22:21, Lukas Renggli <renggli@gmail.com> wrote:
The only solution is to stick with consistent and well though package name scheme. Not the only possible naming strategy, but the one we developed for Seaside works pretty well: http://code.google.com/p/seaside/wiki/PackageNaming
I know about these conventions, but how do I proceed towards them? :) -- Damien Pollet type less, do more [ | ] http://people.untyped.org/damien.pollet