Feb. 2, 2012
6:27 p.m.
I apparently misread some of the papers. I can't find mention of how Morphic was ported, though the ability to use smalltalk inside an LK morph suggests that there is some expectation of reuse of code or perhaps they simply wanted Smalltalk programmers to feel more comfortable with LK morphs from the start. L. On 2/2/12 11:00 AM, Marcus Denker wrote:
On Feb 2, 2012, at 6:56 PM, Lawson English wrote:
My understanding is that one of the design-specs of Lively Kernel Morph was to allow easy porting of the original Smalltalk-based Morphs to LK. If they did that, they did a mistake. Do you really want to be compatible to Squeak Morphic? To that mess?
Marcus
-- Marcus Denker -- http://marcusdenker.de