On 15 February 2011 20:15, <csrabak@bol.com.br> wrote:
Em 15/02/2011 10:37, Igor Stasenko < siguctua@gmail.com > escreveu:
Whereas I understand we are community of spirited and humorous programmers, I think that statements like:
I  agree.   Then  probably,  Pharo  should  move  it  to  separate 'Crap-compat' package.
Are not amenable to the "good energy" Stef is willing to have in the Pharo team.
 ;-P
And the emoticon puts a tongue!
The 'nickname' brings a judgment of value which I think may stir more feelings and doesn't bring anything useful to Pharo...
Yes, in this discussion i wearing hat of an asshole. With humor , of course. Hey.. i'm not killing people and don't burning heretics. Also, the importance of outcome of this discussion is too small for being taken too seriously. I can live with or without #caseOf: (but better without), so relax and have fun :)
 You don't need to remove  #caseOf: implementation. I can stay. Just remove a compiler hacks for it :)  P.S. i patched MessageNode class>>initialize to test if VMMaker can work without compiler  support of caseof: and as  it was expected it works quite well.  I recompiled VMMaker package and then generated full source code of everything, and then built VM. No any errors.
And what would be the results of Levente's benchmark?
I don't care. Read about hammer and microscope.
-- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
-- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.