- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

[Pharo-project] [update 1.3] #13105

by stephane ducasse

13105 ----- - Remove Arc Line Path CruverFitter.... ST-80-Path. Stef

March 22, 2011

[Pharo-project] Issue 3847 in pharo: The absolute value of a negativeZero should behave like a positive zero

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Status: Accepted Owner: nicolas....(a)gmail.com New issue 3847 by nicolas....(a)gmail.com: The absolute value of a negativeZero should behave like a positive zero http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3847 Currently, it does not, try this: Float negativeZero abs sign = 0.0 sign

March 22, 2011

[Pharo-project] Issue 3846 in pharo: There is no way to revert a change in a patch browser nor in Plymorph diff

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Status: Accepted Owner: nicolas....(a)gmail.com New issue 3846 by nicolas....(a)gmail.com: There is no way to revert a change in a patch browser nor in Plymorph diff http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3846 When I browse my local changes versus the official Pharo repository, I'd like to have the possibility of reverting some of my changes. I can't ! The only option (Install) or (install incoming version) will just re-install my own change...

March 22, 2011

[Pharo-project] Issue 3845 in pharo: Polymorph extension shortSummary is not programmed the object way

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Status: Accepted Owner: nicolas....(a)gmail.com New issue 3845 by nicolas....(a)gmail.com: Polymorph extension shortSummary is not programmed the object way http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3845 It is programmed with a sequence of self isThisOrThat ifTrue: [] ifFalse: [] Please don't do that. Just implement a shortSummary where due (with default behaviour ^summary) and use it ! With current shortSummary implementation, a MC with a postscript cannot be diffed.

March 22, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Getting a functionning unstable image

by Igor Stasenko

On 22 March 2011 19:26, Nicolas Cellier <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice(a)gmail.com> wrote: > 2011/3/22 Igor Stasenko <siguctua(a)gmail.com>: >> On 22 March 2011 13:28, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> wrote: >>> >>> On Mar 22, 2011, at 1:25 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> Now condenses change should work too :) >>>> >>> >>> I am slowly adopting a radical "if we don't test it, it's will brake" point of view. >>> I now even say: If we don't test it, it *should* be broken! Because it is dead >>> code and should be removed. >>> >> >> I like a systematic approach. :) >> > > Agree, > If not maintained it won't work. > If not tested it's not maintained. > So your sentence must be true in most cases (except case of luck) > > And if not maintained, the choices are > - revive > - or remove > and that is the Pharo way, Squeak being more conservative. > It is a realistic approach. Obviously there is not much resources in Pharo task forces to spend them on something which nobody maintains/cares anymore. It is better to focus energy on something that everybody needs and make sure it works well. > Nicolas > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.

March 22, 2011

[Pharo-project] [update 1.3] #13104

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

13104 ----- - Polymorph override cleaning. Part three Stef

March 22, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 2144 in pharo: startUp and shutdown missed registered classes

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Updates: Status: Closed Comment #2 on issue 2144 by marcus.d...(a)gmail.com: startUp and shutdown missed registered classes http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=2144 just checked and I think it looks good (last inspect is empty)

March 22, 2011

[Pharo-project] [update 1.3] #13104

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

13104 ----- - Polymorph override cleaning. Part three

March 22, 2011

[Pharo-project] Issue 3844 in pharo: Utilities is in StartupList

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Status: FixToInclude Owner: marcus.d...(a)gmail.com Labels: Milestone-1.3 New issue 3844 by marcus.d...(a)gmail.com: Utilities is in StartupList http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3844 next postscript should do: Smalltalk removeFromStartUpList: Utilities.

March 22, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3701 in pharo: FloatArray>>dot: is defined in plugin but not at the image level

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Updates: Status: FixProposed Comment #1 on issue 3701 by marcus.d...(a)gmail.com: FloatArray>>dot: is defined in plugin but not at the image level http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3701 cs attached Attachments: FloatArray-dot.st 595 bytes

March 22, 2011