- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-dev] #valueWithPossibleArgs:, #valueWithEnoughArguments:, and #cull:

by Stephan Eggermont

Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven(a)stfx.eu> wrote: > Either we keep on adding cruft (or leaving cruft in place) in the sake of > backwards compatibility or be do something about it. It is not hard to > fix a couple of senders. It could be done more softly with a deprecation. > > Cleanups at the level of Object are particularly valuable. It needs to be done in a way that is sustainable. That means with a code rewrite rule. Deprecations are not enough. The number of people who can migrate forwards older code is very small, especially as we are missing crucial parts of design discussion that took place on slack and were not copied to mail. When I created my Morphic screencasts I had to look back to mailing list discussions from 10 years ago and had to run ancient squeak images to gain an understanding of how things were supposed to work and how they changed. Cleanups at this low level need to be done with rewrite rules (and tests) Stephan

Feb. 23, 2018

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #600: 21324-Missing-Browse-receiver-feature-in-the-debugger

by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #600 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #945 was integrated: "21324-Missing-Browse-receiver-feature-in-the-debugger" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/945 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/21324 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

Feb. 23, 2018

[update 6.0] #60535

by Marcus Denker

â¦ CI just started to build: 60535 ----- 21236 Sometimes the debugger opens with the context one off https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/21236 21324 Missing "Browse receiver" feature in the debugger https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/21324

Feb. 23, 2018

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #599: 21320-externalName-still-exists-in-class-Class

by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #599 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #947 was integrated: "21320-externalName-still-exists-in-class-Class" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/947 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/21320 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

Feb. 23, 2018

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #598: 21399 Use category "utilities" instead of "utils" in GTSUnitDebuggerSmokeTest, GoferOperationTest, MonticelloRepositoryBrowser and NativeArrayTest

by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #598 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #942 was integrated: "21399 Use category "utilities" instead of "utils" in GTSUnitDebuggerSmokeTest, GoferOperationTest, MonticelloRepositoryBrowser and NativeArrayTest" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/942 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/21399 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

Feb. 23, 2018

[update 6.0] #60534

by Marcus Denker

â¦ will be the next build (ci is starting) 60534 ----- 21345 Backport World Menu priority https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/21345

Feb. 23, 2018

[Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #597: 21395 Remove obsolete temps in ObsoleteTest

by ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2＠inria.fr

There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #597 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #938 was integrated: "21395 Remove obsolete temps in ObsoleteTest" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/938 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/21395 Build Url: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-ci-jenkins2/job/Test%20pending%20pull%20request%2…

Feb. 23, 2018

Re: [Pharo-dev] control flow graph

by Peter UhnÃ¡k

It would be cool to have the graph for a method as a Calypso tool, so you can see them side by side :) On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 11:47 AM, ClÃ©ment Bera <bera.clement(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I used that in the past on intermediate representations, I feel it is very > useful to directly edit the code of methods with large control flows since > when you have many closing brackets ] ] ] ] you never know where to write > your code. Now it's specific to some use-cases such as algorithms where you > write methods with large control flows, in most methods due to object > oriented programming convention the control flow is not that big. In this > context other things could be possible (Smart suggestions to move code out > of loops, etc.) > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 11:37 AM, Stephane Ducasse < > stepharo.self(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I'm experimenting in building a control flow graph of pharo methods >> and I would like to know if you have ideas about what we can do >> with them to support our development environment. >> >> Stef >> >> > > > -- > ClÃ©ment BÃ©ra > Pharo consortium engineer > https://clementbera.wordpress.com/ > BÃ¢timent B 40, avenue Halley 59650 > <https://maps.google.com/?q=40,+avenue+Halley+59650%C2%A0Villeneuve+d'Ascq&entry=gmail&source=g>Villeneuve > d > <https://maps.google.com/?q=40,+avenue+Halley+59650%C2%A0Villeneuve+d'Ascq&entry=gmail&source=g> > 'Ascq > <https://maps.google.com/?q=40,+avenue+Halley+59650%C2%A0Villeneuve+d'Ascq&entry=gmail&source=g> >

Feb. 23, 2018

Re: [Pharo-dev] Linux installation

by Sean P. DeNigris

Steph, I agree completely. I've spent many hours documenting and researching ways to make Linux installation easier/better - and I don't even use Linux! It was only that the steady stream of questions on the MLs makes it seem fairly important. Sven, thanks - that's exactly what I was looking for. In my current case, it's just for CI because Gitlab.com doesn't support OS X targets out of the box, so I really have no attachment to any flavor. Norbert, that's great, thanks. I'll have to look and see how to tie a Pharo Docker image into the SmalltalkCI infrastructure. Finally, I notice that the following specify different sets of libs. Are they out of sync or for different use cases? - https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-vm/blob/master/scripts/setup-ubuntu.… - http://pharo.org/gnu-linux-installation (Ubuntu section) ----- Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Developers-f1294837.html

Feb. 23, 2018

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] [ANN] 900 pull requests closed for Pharo7!

by Alexandre Bergel

Impressive! Alexandre http://bergel.eu > Le 23 fÃ©vr. 2018 Ã 09:27, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker(a)inria.fr> a Ã©crit : > > Hi, > > March 11, we passed 800. Today (just now) we closed 900 full requests! > > https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pulls > > Marcus

Feb. 23, 2018