- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] Issue 3960 in pharo: Catch all: Remove experimental + ancient backward compatibility code

by pharo＠googlecode.com

Comment #2 on issue 3960 by stephane...(a)gmail.com: Catch all: Remove experimental + ancient backward compatibility code http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3960 Lovely. so funny. We could look for broken self flag: I saw some nice ones recently.

April 5, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Draft Pharo 1.2.1 Release Announcement

by laurent laffont

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 8:52 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>wrote: > > On Apr 5, 2011, at 8:41 PM, laurent laffont wrote: > > > I'm currently translating into french. > > > > I do not understand this: "Made sure that Smalltalk globals is used > instead of Smalltalk" > > Better support for the introduction of SmalltalkImage and SystemDictionary > separation. > OK. So this separation is a work in progress ? I do not understand this one too: Migrated to MethodReferenceWithSource and friends Laurent > > > > Can someone explain ? > > > > Laurent > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:49 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse < > stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: > > I ill have a look when I get a little moment. > > > > Stef > > > > > > On Apr 5, 2011, at 9:19 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > > > > > > > > On 05 Apr 2011, at 07:09, laurent laffont wrote: > > > > > >> Remarks: > > >> - group changed by categories: Morphic/Polymorph, Tools, Under the > hood, ... > > >> - Mocketry is not included in Pharo 1.2 > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the feedback, I applied your suggestions. And uploaded a > newer version. > > > > > > More comments ? > > > > > > Sven > > > > > > > >

April 5, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] abouth nautilus and the removal of CodeHolder hierarchy

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

On Apr 5, 2011, at 5:31 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Maybe I missed part of the discussion, but what is Nautilus? A new browser :) Supporting - groups - package - declarative menus - environment selection - scoped actions - soon refactoring but right now a bit too slow because of the HUGGGGGGEEEEEE trees build by TreeMorphTreeMorph > Squeaksource simply says "A new browser" > > Cheers, > Alexandre

April 5, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Transcript rant

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

Guys I need an update status. Do we keep or not the changes in the system? I will come back to you until we reach a decision :) Stef

April 5, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Draft Pharo 1.2.1 Release Announcement

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

On Apr 5, 2011, at 8:41 PM, laurent laffont wrote: > I'm currently translating into french. > > I do not understand this: "Made sure that Smalltalk globals is used instead of Smalltalk" Better support for the introduction of SmalltalkImage and SystemDictionary separation. > > Can someone explain ? > > Laurent > > > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:49 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr> wrote: > I ill have a look when I get a little moment. > > Stef > > > On Apr 5, 2011, at 9:19 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > > > > > On 05 Apr 2011, at 07:09, laurent laffont wrote: > > > >> Remarks: > >> - group changed by categories: Morphic/Polymorph, Tools, Under the hood, ... > >> - Mocketry is not included in Pharo 1.2 > > > > > > Thanks for the feedback, I applied your suggestions. And uploaded a newer version. > > > > More comments ? > > > > Sven > > >

April 5, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Draft Pharo 1.2.1 Release Announcement

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

On 05 Apr 2011, at 20:41, laurent laffont wrote: > I do not understand this: "Made sure that Smalltalk globals is used instead of Smalltalk" Me neither ;-) > Can someone explain ? Maybe this should be rephrased ?

April 5, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Let's get rid of Core vs. Full

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

On Apr 5, 2011, at 3:00 AM, HernÃ¡n Morales Durand wrote: > Please someone clarify, are you going to kill the core? > > Honestly I don't know how people survive with the dev image, I guess > you have super fast laptops. But you can unload packages. > > Not my case, and the Core just run nice in "old" hardware. > > 2011/4/4 GermÃ¡n Arduino <garduino(a)gmail.com>: >> As I can understand the proposal of Marcus is not have anymore an >> image without the minimal set of tools for development. And I full >> agree with this option. >> >> Allways is possible to shrink the image in a next step if needed. In >> other words, to me Core is not useful witthout a minimal set of dev >> tools and I'm doing production deployments with such tools with no >> problems. By other hand, as most of the images are in remote servers I >> need to use them via VNC and with the dev tools. >> >> Just my opinion. >> >> Cheers. >> >> >> 2011/4/4 Tudor Girba <tudor.girba(a)gmail.com>: >>> This is what I understood from what Marcus said, too :) >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Doru >>> >>> >>> On 4 Apr 2011, at 15:57, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: >>> >>>> This is my ideas. >>>> >>>>> My proposition for 1.3: >>>>> 1) Add MetacelloBrowser and switch to version-separated repositories (like MetaRepoForPharo11, etc. -I don't like the "abbreviated names" but you get the idea) >>>>> 2) Reduce the "full" image to Core+OB+RB+Shout+OCompletion+Finder+MetacelloBrowser >>>>> 3) If it is possible, develop Core image into this reduced full image. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> www.tudorgirba.com >>> >>> "Every thing should have the right to be different." >>> >> >> > > > > -- > HernÃ¡n Morales > Information Technology Manager, > Institute of Veterinary Genetics. > National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET). > La Plata (1900), Buenos Aires, Argentina. > Telephone: +54 (0221) 421-1799. > Internal: 422 > Fax: 425-7980 or 421-1799. >

April 5, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] A lil simplification of MorphTreeNodeMorph

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

**TX!!** :) It was cool to see you both hacking to speed it up. Stef > Cut out some code and extra morphs. > It speeds up rendering to 60% of original. > > @Benjamin > Please verify if it positioning stuff correctly. Because in my image > Settings are now OK. > > @all > I need your feedback to know if it works correctly in other places, > where tree morph used. > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko AKA sig. > <theTreee.2.cs>

April 5, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] [COTDC] 40#2 - NonReentrantWeakMessageSend

by StÃ©phane Ducasse

+1 On Apr 5, 2011, at 8:29 PM, laurent laffont wrote: > Thanks a lot Henrik. > > Laurent. > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Henrik Johansen <henrik.s.johansen(a)veloxit.no> wrote: > NonReentrantWeakMessageSend does what it says, while the message is being executed, additional evaluations will be discarded. > It's used by when:sendOnce:to: protocol from Polymorph events, but unused in the base image. > when:send:to:exclusive: is used one place though. > > It's useful when objects are mutually registered to each other's events, but the actions may lead to the others action being triggered. > Examples are > - two lists whose contents update based on the selection in the other > - The DiffMorph (Uses ExclusiveWeakMessageSend) > > ExclusiveWeakMessageSend are used when the decision whether to process an event is shared between multiple objects. > IE 2 objects respond to different events, but if received simultaneously, only the first of them should have it's action executed. > > With Announcement, the corresponding functionality to non-reentrancy would be achieved using: > VW - AnnouncementCollection>>suspendWhile: anActionBlock > Pharo - Announcer >> suspend: aSubscriber while: anActionBlock (As we neither have a specific AnnouncementCollection class, nor access to Registry itself. Not implemented yet though :P) > > The shared state required to achieve Exclusivity would probably have to recide outside of the framework. > > Cheers, > Henry > > > On Apr 4, 2011, at 9:59 56PM, laurent laffont wrote: > >> Today: NonReentrantWeakMessageSend >> >> >> (ExclusiveWeakMessageSend aborted - no answer) >> >> >> Comment Of The Day Contest - One Day One Comment >> Rules: >> #1: Each day a not commented class is elected. Each day the best comment will be integrated with name of the author(s). >> #2: If you cannot comment it, deprecate it. >> Results: http://code.google.com/p/pharo/wiki/CommentOfTheDayContest >> >> Laurent > >

April 5, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Draft Pharo 1.2.1 Release Announcement

by laurent laffont

I'm currently translating into french. I do not understand this: "Made sure that Smalltalk globals is used instead of Smalltalk" Can someone explain ? Laurent On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:49 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>wrote: > I ill have a look when I get a little moment. > > Stef > > > On Apr 5, 2011, at 9:19 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote: > > > > > On 05 Apr 2011, at 07:09, laurent laffont wrote: > > > >> Remarks: > >> - group changed by categories: Morphic/Polymorph, Tools, Under the hood, > ... > >> - Mocketry is not included in Pharo 1.2 > > > > > > Thanks for the feedback, I applied your suggestions. And uploaded a newer > version. > > > > More comments ? > > > > Sven > > >

April 5, 2011