- Pharo-dev - lists.pharo.org

Re: [Pharo-project] A lil simplification of MorphTreeNodeMorph

by Igor Stasenko

okay.. i found one bug forgot to add cellPositioning: #leftCenter; for colum wrapper morph -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.

April 6, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] A lil simplification of MorphTreeNodeMorph

by Igor Stasenko

On 6 April 2011 17:22, Igor Stasenko <siguctua(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 6 April 2011 15:52, Alain Plantec <alain.plantec(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> Le 06/04/2011 15:14, Igor Stasenko a Ã©crit : >>> >>> and a little more cleanup (should be applied after theTreee) >>> >>> now a block which responsible for providing an icon for concrete item, >>> actually could provide a morph, >>> which means that one could put there an iconic button instead of simple >>> image. >> >> super. >> I've tested and it seems ok for MorphTreeMorph >> >> LazyMorphTreeMorph seems to have row refresh/building problem now. >> try with >> LazyClassListExample new openOn: Object. >> then move the scrollbar to the bottom, then click on the arrow button to get >> the entire list >> and then scroll manually. >> I've observed that some rows are not built correctly now. >> I can't be sure that it is due to your improvements >> > hmm.. on my image it works fine. > > maybe i didn't included something into changeset... let me take a look > no, it works fine. >> Alain >> >> >> > > > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko AKA sig. > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.

April 6, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] A lil simplification of MorphTreeNodeMorph

by Igor Stasenko

On 6 April 2011 15:52, Alain Plantec <alain.plantec(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Le 06/04/2011 15:14, Igor Stasenko a Ã©crit : >> >> and a little more cleanup (should be applied after theTreee) >> >> now a block which responsible for providing an icon for concrete item, >> actually could provide a morph, >> which means that one could put there an iconic button instead of simple >> image. > > super. > I've tested and it seems ok for MorphTreeMorph > > LazyMorphTreeMorph seems to have row refresh/building problem now. > try with > LazyClassListExample new openOn: Object. > then move the scrollbar to the bottom, then click on the arrow button to get > the entire list > and then scroll manually. > I've observed that some rows are not built correctly now. > I can't be sure that it is due to your improvements > hmm.. on my image it works fine. maybe i didn't included something into changeset... let me take a look > Alain > > > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig.

April 6, 2011

[Pharo-project] Metacello chapter

by Sven Van Caekenberghe

On 06 Apr 2011, at 09:58, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > here is a new version of the metacello chapter. > So we wrote it, rewrote it, rerewrote it. > Now if this is of interest for you you can read it. > > But if you don't it means that I'm losing my time and I should stop writing and like > that you can cry that there is no doc about Pharo. > <Metacello.pdf> Well written, article/book class documentation, like the PBE & Seaside book, and chapters like the one above, are really important. I know this takes a lot of time, so thanks for the effort! Sven

April 6, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] abouth nautilus and the removal of CodeHolder hierarchy

by Benjamin

On Apr 6, 2011, at 1:19 PM, StÃ©phane Ducasse wrote: > > On Apr 5, 2011, at 2:32 PM, Fernando Olivero wrote: > >> Hi Ben, i was thinking about the discussion of the menus: >> >> Since you are using menu pragma builder, and have explicit views for >> each tool, then the CodeHolder hierarchy is no longer needed. Because >> the specialized views get the behavior for answering the actions in >> the menus (which currently is spread across the StringHolder >> hierarchy). > > I would say yes but I will let ben replied with more depth if necessary. There is two kinds of menus, menus provided by the lists/trees and menus provided by the pluggable text morph. They're different because first ones really act on the model elements (here classes/methods/etc), when second ones act on text For lists/trees menus, because they act on your model have to be handled locally ( by your model or your view depending of the action ). For text menus, they act on text, and will always act on text, so they should be managed by a kind of TextModel, because it's not the role of your Browser to tell how to implement copy/paste, or implementors :) > > >> So this is the main reason why you simple need a pluggable text model, >> for the model of the views. And a pluggable TextModel (or StringHolder >> in Pharo) would suffice? Is this correct? >> >> >> Thanks, >> Fernando > StringHolder shouldn't exist anymore :) For Nautilus, menus actions are handled by the view, but could/should be moved in the model for some of them, but it can be a bit hard to separate the ones only related to the view, and ones relatives to the model ... And text menus are handled by the PluggableTextMorph whose model is SmalltalkEditor. So it's SmalltalkEditor responsibility to know how to look for senders/implementors/etc I hope it answer your question ^^ Ben

April 6, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN] Pharo 1.2.1. Setup for Win32 (including CogVM)

by Marcus Denker

On Apr 6, 2011, at 4:48 PM, Torsten Bergmann wrote: > Geert wrote: >> I reckon the OneClick should also use this excellent Pharo branded Cog VM :) > > We already take care. I mailed it to Marcus, I guess he has to > find the time to integrate it. > Yes, OOPSLA deadline is on Friday... Marcus -- Marcus Denker -- http://www.marcusdenker.de INRIA Lille -- Nord Europe. Team RMoD.

April 6, 2011

[Pharo-project] Draft Pharo 1.2.1 Release Announcement

by Torsten Bergmann

Laurent wrote: >I've started :) http://linuxfr.org/news/pharo12 I guess James Robertson was first (when we still talked about it). See http://www.jarober.com/blog/blogView?showComments=true&printTitle=Pharo_1.2… and it is therefore already on http://planet.smalltalk.org However - I now followed too: http://astares.blogspot.com Bye T. -- GMX DSL Doppel-Flat ab 19,99 Euro/mtl.! Jetzt mit gratis Handy-Flat! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl

April 6, 2011

[Pharo-project] [ANN] Pharo 1.2.1. Setup for Win32 (including CogVM)

by Torsten Bergmann

Geert wrote: >I reckon the OneClick should also use this excellent Pharo branded Cog VM :) We already take care. I mailed it to Marcus, I guess he has to find the time to integrate it. Bye T. -- NEU: FreePhone - kostenlos mobil telefonieren und surfen! Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone

April 6, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] [ANN] Pharo 1.2.1. Setup for Win32 (including CogVM)

by Geert Claes

I reckon the OneClick should also use this excellent Pharo branded Cog VM :) -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/ANN-Pharo-1-2-1-Setup-for-Win32-including-CogVM-tp343… Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

April 6, 2011

Re: [Pharo-project] Draft Pharo 1.2.1 Release Announcement

by laurent laffont

On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck(a)gmail.com > wrote: > But when are we going to send this mail to this mailing list? and > pharo-users? etc... > can we start to buzz arround ? I've started :) http://linuxfr.org/news/pharo12 Laurent. > > > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Adrian Lienhard <adi(a)netstyle.ch> wrote: > >> Thanks for checking, Mariano. I fixed it. >> >> Adrian >> >> On Apr 6, 2011, at 10:09 , Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: >> >> > I think this part is wrong (see screenshot) >> > >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Adrian Lienhard <adi(a)netstyle.ch> >> wrote: >> > On Apr 5, 2011, at 22:27 , Adrian Lienhard wrote: >> > >> > > As far as I see there's one thing missing on the website: the download >> sticker for the one click image (top right on the page) still points to >> 1.1.1. I'll try to change the sticker and link tomorrow morning. >> > >> > The new sticker is online. I've linked to the non-COG one-click image. >> Is that what we want? >> > >> > I've also updated the one-click image links on >> http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download >> > >> > So, as far as I can tell, the website is ready. >> > >> > Cheers >> > Adrian >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Mariano >> > http://marianopeck.wordpress.com >> > >> > <Screen shot 2011-04-06 at 10.08.49 AM.png> >> >> >> > > > -- > Mariano > http://marianopeck.wordpress.com > >

April 6, 2011